Blake Lively Labeled A ‘F–king Terrorist’ By Film Executive During Heated ‘It Ends With Us’ Production
Explosive new court documents have shed light on the chaotic and hostile production environment of the 2024 hit film ‘It Ends With Us’. Testimony unsealed on Tuesday reveals that a high-ranking studio executive allegedly referred to leading actress Blake Lively as a “f–king terrorist” during a particularly tense standoff. Andrea Giannetti, an executive vice president at Sony Pictures, admitted to making the disparaging remark during her deposition. This shocking revelation has emerged as the complex legal battle between Lively and her co-star Justin Baldoni heads toward a jury trial later this year.
The conflict reportedly reached a boiling point in November 2023 when Lively refused to return to the set without significant changes. Giannetti testified that the actress presented a “17-point list” of strict conditions that had to be met before she would resume filming. The executive described the situation to a producer as a hostage crisis which prompted the harsh “terrorist” label. Giannetti explained that the studio had already invested nearly $28 million and felt trapped by the sudden list of demands.
Beyond the specific name-calling incident, Giannetti characterized the daily production environment as a “s–t show” due to the unceasing friction. She noted that Lively frequently complained about Baldoni and described the director as “unprepared, indecisive, and inexperienced” throughout the difficult shoot. These internal conflicts created a volatile atmosphere that made the set uncomfortable for many involved in the project. The deposition paints a stark picture of a production on the brink of collapse due to clashing creative visions and personality conflicts.
Lively’s legal team has responded to the unsealed documents by firmly shifting the focus back to her specific claims against Baldoni. Attorney Sigrid McCrawley emphasized that the court previously dismissed the retaliatory countersuit filed by Baldoni’s production company earlier this year. McCrawley stated that the newly released evidence actually supports Lively’s original lawsuit regarding harassment and reputation damage. The defense maintains that the actress was simply advocating for her safety and creative integrity in a hostile work environment.
The high-stakes nature of the filming schedule added significant fuel to the fire during the reported standoff between the talent and the studio. Giannetti explained in her testimony that they had to finish the movie or deem it unreleasable which would have caused a massive financial catastrophe. This panic over the budget explains the severity of the executive’s private reaction to Lively’s stipulations. The testimony highlights just how desperate the situation had become for the leadership team trying to salvage the blockbuster.
Despite the alleged name-calling and toxicity behind the scenes, the film went on to become a major financial success. Giannetti admitted she even sent a glowing text to Lively praising her “blood, sweat, and tears” after the movie cleared $50 million during its opening weekend. However, the ongoing lawsuit proves that the box office numbers did little to heal the personal rifts formed during production. The entertainment industry is now watching closely as the trial approaches to see what other secrets will surface from the deposition.
Let us know what you think about these new allegations regarding the production drama in the comments.