How Bollywood Became the World’s Largest Live Experiment in AI Cinema and Its Impact on Hollywood

While Hollywood grapples with the role of artificial intelligence on film sets, India’s entertainment industry has already moved beyond this debate.

With no strong unions advocating for caution and a lack of national legislation to enforce meaningful guidelines, Bollywood has emerged as a significant real-world test of what occurs when one of the world’s most prolific film industries adopts AI without safeguards, according to a report from The Hollywood Reporter.

India leads the globe in film production, and the pressures driving this shift are evident. The number of moviegoers dropped to 832 million in the latest measured year, down from over a billion in 2019, while box-office revenue has remained inconsistent, heavily reliant on a few hits and higher ticket prices.

In response, Indian studios are leveraging AI at a scale that exceeds much of Hollywood, utilizing it to create entire films, dub content into various languages, and even modify the endings of older titles.

A notable example of this practice is the romantic drama ‘Raanjhanaa’. Eros Media World re-released the cherished film with an AI-altered ending, swapping a tragic conclusion where the protagonist dies for a happier one where he awakens to his lover’s tearful smile.

Lead actor Dhanush publicly criticized this decision, arguing that the AI remake robbed the film of its essence and set a concerning precedent for art and artists. In the United States, under a SAG-AFTRA agreement, studios cannot digitally alter an actor’s performance or create a digital replica without the actor’s informed consent. However, no such protections exist in India.

Despite the controversy, the commercial outcomes were enough to encourage the studio. India’s largest cinema chain, PVR Inox, reported that ticket sales for the AI-altered Tamil version exceeded the 2025 average by 12 percentage points. Eros is now reviewing its catalog of 3,000 titles for more candidates.

The economic factors driving this shift are hard to ignore. An AI studio head noted that production costs have been reduced to about one-fifth of traditional filmmaking in genres like mythology and fantasy, with timelines shortened to a quarter of what they used to be.

This disruption affects more than just directors and actors. India’s dubbing industry, comprising around 20,000 freelance voice artists serving a film market that spans over ten major languages, faces an existential threat. A tool called VisualDub, created by Bengaluru-based startup NeuralGarage, now adjusts an actor’s lip movements and facial expressions in real time, making dialogue appear to be spoken naturally in a second language. Veteran voice artist Ghazal Khanna estimates that approximately 70 to 80 percent of brand voices for major Indian TV and video commercials have already been replaced by AI.

The contrast with Hollywood is stark, not merely because American studios are more principled. The WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes in recent years were largely fought to establish contractual limits on AI use, and those protections continue to expand. In India, filmmakers without that institutional support must navigate these tensions on their own.

Director Shakun Batra told The Hollywood Reporter that resistance from established Hollywood figures stems from “the top of a very established industry,” and that a young filmmaker in a rural area without access to studios or budgets “is not going to wait ten years for permission to make their first film.”

Conversely, director Anurag Kashyap countered this perspective, stating that AI carries both human and environmental costs that he cannot overlook, emphasizing that all a filmmaker truly needs is a camera. The ongoing debate within Bollywood mirrors the one unfolding in Hollywood, but in India, the experiment is already in full swing, and the outcomes, for better or worse, may be shaping the future for everyone else.

Have something to add? Let us know in the comments.