Netflix’s ‘Michael Jackson: The Verdict’ Rotten Tomatoes Score Revealed

Netflix’s new documentary series Michael Jackson: The Verdict has premiered to a mixed reception on Rotten Tomatoes, garnering both acclaim and criticism for its retrospective on one of the most scrutinized trials in modern pop culture history.

Directed by Nick Green and produced by Candle True Stories, this three-part series delves into Michael Jackson’s 2005 criminal trial, which concluded with a “Not Guilty” verdict after 12 weeks filled with testimony, media frenzy, and public discourse. The documentary revisits the case through interviews, archival footage, and insights from individuals involved in the trial, including jurors, journalists, and witnesses from both sides.

According to Netflix, the series seeks to re-evaluate how the trial unfolded in court and its lasting impact on public perception today. It also addresses the ongoing debate surrounding Jackson’s legacy, nearly two decades after the trial’s conclusion.

The series debuted on June 3 and quickly gained traction online. As of its initial Rotten Tomatoes ratings, Michael Jackson: The Verdict boasts an 80% critic score from 5 reviews, while its audience score is significantly lower at 4%, based on fewer than 50 ratings.

Critics have expressed varied reactions. William Mullally from The National (UAE) offered a favorable review, stating, “The Verdict will not settle the debate. But it does make looking away from it much harder.” He rated it 3 out of 5.

Sreeparna Sengupta of The Times of India also gave a positive response, describing it as an “engrossing, unsettling watch,” and awarding it 3.5 out of 5. Her review emphasized how the series contributes to the extensive catalog of documentaries examining Jackson’s life and controversies.

From Variety, critic Aramide Tinubu provided a more contemplative review. While she did not assign a score, she remarked, “When it all shakes out, ‘Michael Jackson: The Verdict’ is an indictment of a society committed to whatever narrative made most sense to them. Two decades after the trial ended, the only innocents in all of this were the children.” Her comments focused on the broader societal implications of the trial rather than solely on the documentary.

Not all reviews were favorable. James Hall from Daily Telegraph (UK) rated the series negatively at 2 out of 5, arguing that it contributes little new to the ongoing dialogue surrounding Jackson’s life and legacy. He suggested that the series feels redundant in a media landscape already saturated with similar narratives.

Jonathon Wilson of Ready Steady Cut provided a more balanced perspective, giving it a score of 3 out of 5. He noted that the documentary offers a fair examination of the case but acknowledged that the subject matter may be too intricate and debated to fully resolve through a single series.

Overall, critics characterize Michael Jackson: The Verdict as a serious and at times uncomfortable viewing experience that revisits a profoundly controversial chapter in entertainment history. While some commend its depth and perspective, others feel it falls short of providing new insights into a case that has been extensively analyzed.

Have something to add? Let us know in the comments!